Petra It's a year now, still in a dark place's Reviews > Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions
by
by

Petra It's a year now, still in a dark place's review
bookshelves: 2015-reviews, popculture-anthropology, psycho-neurology-crime, reviewed, 2015-read
May 31, 2015
bookshelves: 2015-reviews, popculture-anthropology, psycho-neurology-crime, reviewed, 2015-read
“I asked them why when they persecute men, for religion or colour it was seen by the world as oppression and when they persecute women, it was dismissed as tradition.” Emer Martin
This book is generally brilliant if you ignore the misogyny. It is a book written by a man about a man's world for men. The "Our' in the title does not include half the world.
The misogny, the putting down of fat women, ugly ones, old ones in this often otherwise insightful and percipient book is making me groan. The author is trying to prove something we all know, that we (he uses 'we' and 'our' to sound inclusive, but he only means men really) do not make good decisions when sexually aroused. To that end he sets up an experiment where the men, MIT students, will have to answer a set of questions 'sober' and while they are wanking to pictures of buxom young women flashed on their computers.
The questions include, Would you want to have sex with a really fat woman? An ugly one? A woman over 50? All the undesirable women.
All these women are put down as sexual objects these really clever guys wouldn't want to have sex with unless they were so aroused by any stimuli they didn't care. That their general powers of discernment and decision-making ie. we don't screw fat,ugly or old women, would go by the board because at that stage they'd screw anything. Also, that in such an aroused state, those clever MIT men, future leaders of technology and business, perhaps even footballers) those men might deliberately get a woman drunk and/or persist in pushy or downright aggressive sexual advances even after she had said 'no' and they wouldn't give a monkeys about using a condom either.
(Part of me wonders how those men felt who had girlfriends who didn't look like supermodels).
Personally I think he wrote up the experiment so as he could begin with describing the visual of a cling-film (saran wrap to Americans) wrapped computer (to protect it from splashes of semen) flashing porn and questions and a man 'furiously wanking with his left hand' while propped up on the bed.
Ok, so I'm predictably irrational about books that slag off my half the human race. You know that I will pick up the misogyny and be compelled to write about it.
This book is generally brilliant if you ignore the misogyny. It is a book written by a man about a man's world for men. The "Our' in the title does not include half the world.
The misogny, the putting down of fat women, ugly ones, old ones in this often otherwise insightful and percipient book is making me groan. The author is trying to prove something we all know, that we (he uses 'we' and 'our' to sound inclusive, but he only means men really) do not make good decisions when sexually aroused. To that end he sets up an experiment where the men, MIT students, will have to answer a set of questions 'sober' and while they are wanking to pictures of buxom young women flashed on their computers.
The questions include, Would you want to have sex with a really fat woman? An ugly one? A woman over 50? All the undesirable women.
All these women are put down as sexual objects these really clever guys wouldn't want to have sex with unless they were so aroused by any stimuli they didn't care. That their general powers of discernment and decision-making ie. we don't screw fat,ugly or old women, would go by the board because at that stage they'd screw anything. Also, that in such an aroused state, those clever MIT men, future leaders of technology and business, perhaps even footballers) those men might deliberately get a woman drunk and/or persist in pushy or downright aggressive sexual advances even after she had said 'no' and they wouldn't give a monkeys about using a condom either.
(Part of me wonders how those men felt who had girlfriends who didn't look like supermodels).
Personally I think he wrote up the experiment so as he could begin with describing the visual of a cling-film (saran wrap to Americans) wrapped computer (to protect it from splashes of semen) flashing porn and questions and a man 'furiously wanking with his left hand' while propped up on the bed.
Ok, so I'm predictably irrational about books that slag off my half the human race. You know that I will pick up the misogyny and be compelled to write about it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Predictably Irrational.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 31, 2015
– Shelved as:
to-read
May 31, 2015
– Shelved
June 3, 2015
–
Started Reading
June 7, 2015
– Shelved as:
2015-reviews
June 7, 2015
– Shelved as:
popculture-anthropology
June 7, 2015
– Shelved as:
psycho-neurology-crime
June 7, 2015
– Shelved as:
reviewed
August 2, 2015
–
Finished Reading
August 21, 2015
– Shelved as:
2015-read
Comments Showing 1-50 of 70 (70 new)
message 1:
by
Ashley
(new)
-
added it
Jun 03, 2015 09:59PM

reply
|
flag





I just got Kindle the other day and I love it. I don't mind walls and walls of books, but when you move THAT is the problem!! ha ha. I look at my books like money in the bank. They're always worth a quarter to a dollar. And if the power grid goes down?...


When I go to someone's house I always look at their bookshelves. It tells me who they are. (I also look in the bathroom cabinet, but that's more common nosiness).
I think I'd be evicted from the house if I picked up someone's ebook or phone and started swiping through it.


When I go to someone's house I always look at their bookshelves. It tells me who they are. (I also look in the bathroom ca..."
Ha ha, I think you are correct on all accounts.


You are correct, Ashley. I've seen some neat pictures on the net of wall to wall, floor to ceiling of books, beds made out of books, tables etc.


LOl, it is a bit much when we are a told that for guys to fancy us when they are not sexually aroused or sober we have to be young, slim and beautiful otherwise we are dogs.



When I go to someone's house I always look at their bookshelves. It tells me who they are."
Yes, yes, yes.
But have you seen the bizarre wallpaper that looks like books? Heresy.

I have a narrow drive outside my kitchen window with a retaining wall the other side. Very shady and undercover. It sounds nasty but it is hurricane-proof and keeps the kitchen very cool. However it's phenomenally boring looking at a pinky sort of wall, so book wallpaper would be wonderful.

http://www.remodelista.com/posts/wall...
http://www.photowall.co.uk/photo-wall...
http://www.ilovewallpaper.co.uk/wallp...
http://www.diy.com/departments/bookca...



I don't know. Ask the author! He thinks that a man would have so aroused he'd fuck anything but in his right mind he would reject such old women.
I don't think the author thinks that intelligent, discerning young men, the flower of American society (!) actually like and fancy women for anything other than youth, beauty and big tits.

Best comment of the day :-D"
Completely agree Petra!

It amazes me every day how many veeeeeeeeeeeeery imperfect men- sit around and pick apart women for what they see as their flaws. And women do it to other women as well. It is getting worse instead of better. Very sad.
Great review Petra...and great comment Debbie!! :)

He is a professor, and my conclusion was that he was a bit lazy--so many of the experiments he cites (or runs) were done with college students. It is certainly easy to recruit for a study on a college campus ($20 for an hour of your time), but that means results really are only generalizable to a small percent of the population. And of course, his friends and colleagues are professors as well and recruit from the same population.

The pigeons out-performed the students! Then they gave the students a food reward (M&Ms I think) and then the students did better too!
message 40:
by
Petra It's a year now, still in a dark place
(last edited Aug 22, 2015 12:38PM)
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars


What men really want is really young vacuous women right? Let's prove if that's always the case. My question: who cares????
Do I care if a man would deign to sleep with less than the socially acceptable norm while in the midst of wanking??? I understand the concept of men who can't control their impulses and I have read some to understand triggers of rape in some men - but what does it really have to do with sleeping with chubby women? Who cares?
I'm glad I read your review because I'll save feeling insulted.

I fail to understand why men can't control themselves, because I think they can. They do. It's just a few men, a minority, but a damaging, violent, evil minority who won't. In countries where they shroud women, it isn't done to control men's temptations, it's done to control women, because they can.
As far as wanking to less than socially acceptable women in the sense of peer group norms, it is just as well that norms vary according to societies. West Indians are a lot less fussy about age, figure or face and more about the total package and actually being lucky enough to get a woman.


It wasn't a bad book, it just started off in this totally misogynist way. The rest of it was fairly sensible and a good read.


There are many books by men that regard men as representing the human race and that women are just adjuncts and not even worth writing about unless they are beautiful (ie. fuckable). Look at Tolkein's The Lord of the Rings, Ernest Hemingway was a misogynist, homophobic, anti-semitic and racist yet people have no problem reading and praising these authors. So it is with this book. The author is overtly misogynist but still writes interesting stuff worth reading.